Theory of 4

Posted by: Russell Miles on 2010-10-25 05:40:50.0

Think about a week, any given week where you were 'working' (I always feel the urge to use inverted commas for 'work', because for some of us work is fun).

Now that you have a week in mind, have a think about the number of creative jobs, or pieces of creative work of substantial size if job for you means something larger than a week, that you successfully got to done in that given week. These could be things like "Wrote a blog post", "Created a Screencast", "Created an iPhone/iPad logo for a client", "Created that piece of functionality" but you're probably thinking a little small if you're thinking "I wrote that tweet".

So, how many do you have? My theory du jour is that you probably don't have many than 4 discrete pieces of work, creative in nature, that require a decent level of thought and concentration, that you got to done in a given week as shown in the graph below.

(Created using Autodesk Sketchbook and Omnigraffle on the iPad.)

The theory's foundations are simple. There are roughly 4 productive full days in a week (Friday afternoon, really!?) and I suspect that there is a natural cadence for an individual to complete, at most, 4 creative tasks to match the 4 productive days. In fact, I suspect that we feel more and more unfulfilled the less we do from 4, and the more stressed out we get when things are over 4 (or worse, we are so swamped in uncreative busy-tasks that we don't feel we've done anything).

Of course, this is all just suspicion (and definitely not a license to let your boss know you've "already done your allotted 4 creative tasks for this week" on a Tuesday). The flip side of that is that if you're a manager and you have some tasks that involve this sort of deep thought, it might pay to be aware of this natural cadence  and structure the workload as best you can.

In a nutshell, for creative, heavy-thought-required tasks the theory seems to follow for the past 10 years of my life, roughly speaking. Yes, there are times when I've sacrificed everything to get something like 10 discrete pieces of creative work done, but that definitely delved into having no life and stress levels bordering on the dangerous.

So have a think and see if the theory of 4 works for you. I'd love to hear your findings! 


be the first to rate this blog

About Russell Miles

Russell Miles

A self-confessed polyglot programmer, Russ Miles is a senior consultant for SpringSource in the UK where he works with various companies to help them take full advantage of the Spring Framework. To ensure that he has as little spare time as possible, Russ contributes to various open source projects and has authored a number of books.

Russ is a keen contributor to open source projects and an author for O'Reilly Media. He has authored and co-authored 3 books; "AspectJ Cookbook", "Learning UML 2.0" and "Head First Software Development"

Prior to joining SpringSource, Russ gained experience of enterprise development throughout all tiers of application architecture including high performance and usability presentation tier services for the Search and Mobile Portal industries right through to maximum availability application and data services for the Defence industry.

Russ holds an MSc. Software Engineering from Oxford University.

More About Russell »

NFJS, the Magazine

2010-10-01 00:00:00.0 Issue Now Available
  • What's Brewing in Java 7: The Language Features
    by Venkat Subramaniam
  • Waste!
    by Hamlet D`Arcy
  • Arquillian: A component Model for Integration Testing
    by Dan Allen
  • Spring Roo - A Jump-Start for Your Java Project
    by Paul Chapman
Learn More »